Thursday, June 30, 2022
Google search engine
HomeWorldNorth AmericaAmerica preparing for chaos as Roe v Wade law may be overturned

America preparing for chaos as Roe v Wade law may be overturned


We are 100% independently owned, free from corporate ownership and control. Help support a free press by donating to us.

Protests erupted on Monday night in the streets of Washington D.C. with both pro-abortion supporters and anti-abortion rights activists up in arms about an impending Supreme Court decision that could see a historic court ruling set aside.  Pro-choice groups have apparently urged followers to ‘storm catholic churches on Sunday (Mother’s Day) to protest changes to abortion laws in the United States after a draft Supreme Court opinion was leaked to the press. Another group called Rise Up 4 Abortion Rights, is allegedly organizing a ‘week of resistance’ commencing on Mother’s Day, with protests in New York, Chicago, and Seattle.

The draft is in response to a recent application by Thomas E Dobbs, the State Health Officer of the Mississippi Department of Health, requesting the famous Roe v Wade (1973) ruling on abortion be overturned.

The United States Supreme Court decision in Roe v Wade (1973) supported the fundamental right of a woman to decide whether or not to terminate her pregnancy, based on underlying values of ‘integrity. To uphold this fundamental right, the court applied what is referred to as the strict scrutiny test – that is the highest standard a court can impose to evaluate the constitutionality of governmental discrimination.

Following this test, the court in Roe v Wade (1973) upheld that pregnancy could be divided into three trimesters to assist in determining the rights involved in abortion. The first trimester saw the decision to terminate a pregnancy at the sole discretion of the woman. During the second trimester, the state could regulate (but not outlaw) abortions in the interests of the mother’s health. After this time, the state could regulate or outlaw abortions in the interests of potential life, except when necessary to preserve the life or health of the mother. This decision was upheld in a second case – Planned Parenthood v Casey (1992).

Recently, Roe v Wade (1973) has been revisited, with US authorities fearful of potential chaos resulting from any change to abortion laws.

According to US publication, Politico, Justice Alito wrote an initial majority draft circulated inside the Supreme Court that votes to overturn abortion rights. Further reading of the draft opinion discusses the State of Mississippi’s request to ‘uphold the constitutionality of the law that generally prohibits an abortion after the fifteenth week of pregnancy- several weeks before the point at which a fetus is now regarded as ‘viable’ outside the womb.’

It goes on to say that the ‘State’s primary argument is that we should reconsider and overrule Roe and Casey and once again allow each State to regulate abortion as its citizens wish.’

The draft opinion is said to completely overturn the Roe v Wade decision, with Alito writing that Roe was ‘egregiously wrong from the start. It went on to say that ‘it is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.’

The opinion of the Court opened with the lines:

Abortion presents a profound moral issue on which Americans hold sharply conflicting views. Some believe fervently that a human person comes into being at conception and that abortion ends innocent life. Others feel just as strongly that any regulation of abortion invades a woman’s right to control her own body and prevents women from achieving full equality. Still others in a third group think that abortion should be allowed under some but not all circumstances…’

The backlash has come thick and fast from both sides of the debate including from prominent political figures. President Joe Biden has allegedly called Justice Alito’s argument “way overboard and radical”. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a leading Democrat has said ‘the senate will vote next week on protecting abortion rights. Americans will see where every single Senator stands.’ On Friday 6 May 2022 Schumer ‘tweeted ‘We’re standing together with Senate Democratic women to announce that next week the Senate is going to vote on the Women’s Health Protection Act to codify the right to abortion into federal law.’

According to some news reports, US House of Representatives speakers Nancy Pelosi and Schumer said the move to overturn Roe v Wade ‘would go down as an abomination, one of the worst and most damaging decisions in modern history.’ Independent Senator Bernie Sands was quoted as saying congress must pass legislation that codifies Roe v Wade as the law of the land in this country NOW.’

The implications of overturning the Roe v Wade decision are significant, including the potential for doctors to be imprisoned for assisting women to access abortions. Legal experts have also warned that the decision may lead to many women being prosecuted and every single pregnancy loss to be investigated. The decision will have consequences for all women given the potential to remove a woman’s right to bodily autonomy. Some fear that the overturning of the Roe v Wade decision will have broader implications on gay marriage.

A final decision is yet to be reached with many holding on to the hope that the precedent will remain in place and women will continue to have control over their lives.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Ivan M. Paton on Approval Of Remdesivir
Beth on Free and Fair?
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Victorian Change to Mandates
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Health care in crisis
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Health care in crisis
Burnthehousedown on Postal vote outrage
Shanthini Balasuriyar on Queensland CHO – a law unto himself
Billie Hutton on Convoy to Canberra Two
Lynn a freedom warrior on Convoy to Canberra Two
Elizabeth on Ruble on the rise
Yvonne Ford on Pfizer drug recall
Gene Trevor Wyngaard on NZ Scrap vaccine mandates
Frances Mahy on Russia Sanctions The U.S.A
Peter Coxhead on My Story, So Far
Theodora Zajaz on Novak Out Of U.S. Open.
Leonie Young on Probuild Buy-Out
Shelley Madden on Pfizer, Stranger than Fiction
Debra Mullins on AVN vs Brendan Murphy
Malcolm on The End Game
Sabina on What’s Next?
Drew Duncan on Belarus Under Threat
Robyn on What’s Next?
Sofia Rutteman on Here We Go Again, Part 2
Robert Burns on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Kim Henry on Pfizer Whistleblower
Lee Y on Give Me Five
Linda Nemeth on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Warwick Hibble on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Lesley on The Data Is Ours
Patricia Poppeliers on Here We Go Again, Part 2
Dani Stevens on Trouble in Paradise
Dianedraytonbuckland on Facebook: Judge, Jury and Executioner
Michael Chere on Before You Inject Your Child
Kerry Taylor on Which one of us is blind?
Kathy Hirsch on First Nations Locked Down
Gloria Feather on Undermining The Indigenous.
Marie Millikin on Let us talk about intuition.
Lucienne Helm on Let us talk about intuition.
Susan Wilson on The real revolution
Jennifer Leonard on 2020 a year to forget
F J on Strange Times
Tracey Parsons on IBAC DAY 9
stacie rose on Which one of us is blind?
Uncertainty on My Story, So Far
Tracey on A Veteran’s Plea
Zaidee Lens Van Rijn on My Story, So Far
Alissandra Moon on The Rise of Medical Apartheid
Peggy Gothe on Mum, I don’t feel well
Keith Cashman on Mum, I don’t feel well
Melinda c Taylor on Mum, I don’t feel well
Vaughan Oke on Which one of us is blind?
Jane Ramsay on Choice vs Ultimatum
Brian K Wilson on Which one of us is blind?
Scott Dawson on Which one of us is blind?