Thursday, June 30, 2022
Google search engine
HomeAttorney General called upon to prosecute “Freedom” protesters

Attorney General called upon to prosecute “Freedom” protesters

WE NEED FUNDS TO FIGHT MAINSTREAM MEDIA MISINFORMATION

We are 100% independently owned, free from corporate ownership and control. Help support a free press by donating to us.

Dramatic scenes unfolded at the front of the Australian Capital Territory Law Courts on Monday 4th April. An enthusiastic gathering ensued regarding the first of many upcoming prosecutions against protesters of the Freedom movement which initially descended upon Canberra in February of 2022.   

The two plaintiffs are facing charges of trespass on commonwealth land.

Plaintiff Ms Crabb and her partner Mr O’Brien were barred entry to the Law Courts after refusing to wear face coverings. Ms Crabb argued that, under the Biosecurity Act of 2015, section 61, the Court Sherriff’s had not provided a medical directive signed-off by a Biosecurity Officer. The Magistrate informed the plaintiff that by not wearing a mask they could not enter the court room, constituting a “failure to appear”. This was as the Plaintiffs stood at the front door, ready to enter and despite the ACT having no standing mandates.   

A prominent Sydney solicitors barrister, was sought to appear at the last minute, representing the plaintiff via phone call. Australian Federal Police, in parallel with the Plaintiffs, sought an adjournment until the 19th of April. It was outside the Court House that bomb-shell allegations were proposed by a prominent speaker for the Freedom movement, Queenslander Phillip Jones.   

Addressing a large crowd of protesters, along with hundreds of viewers on livestream. Mr Jones stated, “These are the first two trespass cases on Commonwealth Land [from the freedom movement]. I have been told they [the Government] were going to throw absolutely every single one of our taxpayer dollars at this case, because they want to set a precedence to use this particular legislation to stop people from protesting.”   

The unusually tame gathering of normally vocal Freedom protesters, who have gathered in Canberra from around Australia, fell silent as Mr Jones continued, “The people they [Ms Crabb and Mr O’Brien] are going to be fighting are the Attorney General’s Office. The Australian Federal Police want to bring the Attorney General’s Office into this case. Every single taxpayer’s dollar spread to its limits to fight two people in a van”.   

“You know why they’re fighting two people in a van with the Attorney General’s Office?” asked Mr Jones. “These are the first two people being charged with these [ordinance charges]. There are lots of people being charged with these particular things; they [the Australian Federal Police] want to set a precedence so they can continue to misuse this legislation”, Mr. Jones continued.   

“If you look through the history of Australia, with the 1932 ordinance 8-a, they misused that legislation a lot. They displaced Aboriginal communities, they have displaced farmers so that they can drill and frack, they’re using it again. We have been at war with the government, and we have been to-ing and fro-ing, taunting each other, and there’s been a few little shots fired across the bow, from us and from them. These are the real shots”, Mr. Jones divulged.   

“These are the first two shots in this war, these are the big guns; the Attorney General’s Office is the biggest gun. If we let these people beat [Ms Crabb and Mr O’Brien], we’ve lost the war, because if we can’t win the first two shots, we’re on the back foot running already. Why have they chosen these two shots? Because if they fire these two shots now… They’re worried, they’re concerned, we’re winning. So, they needed to pull out the biggest guns they had, on two people in a van. Because these two people in a van represent this movement. Those two people in a van are the first two people that were standing on the front line, that were in the crosshairs.”   

A GiveSendGo has been set up to fund the court case on behalf of Ms Crabb and Mr O‘Brien (https://www.givesendgo.com/lfff). The pair are seeking to raise $200,000 for the proceedings. Mr O ‘Brien, who previously performed musically on Parliament lawn during the Freedom rallies, is also raising money for the Legal Fund For Freedom (https://www.lfff.com.au) through sales of his music single, “We’re Still Here” (https://stream.atomicmusic.space/track/2135-kane-obz-were-still-here). The profile of the freedom movement in the Australian Capital Territory has reached a new stage.

RELATED ARTICLES

6 COMMENTS

  1. this will mean war, (Commonwealth land) this stupid bitch who calls herself the attorney General has no Idea about what the word Commonwealth means. The Quick & Garran annotated Constitution of the Australian Commonwealth means this. Australia is the land Mass the Commonwealth is the people who live on the land mass. this brainless twit who calls herself the attorney General is saying the land belongs to the people(THE COMMONWEALTH) is the people.
    She is not a lawfully constitutted attorney General, she works for the US registered Political Party traitors and all need to go to the Gallows as they are all traitors, every last one of them.

  2. You wanna get specific about whose land it is; it belonged to aboriginal people first mate. It’s not theirs, the government took it by force from the original custodians of the land. And then they want to prosecute people for protesting peacefully on land that was taken by the government forcefully? Do you not see the irony? But I guess my heritage is Scottish; we know what it’s like to be downtrodden. We don’t give up. Whether this fight takes a year or 50, I don’t care. Wrong is wrong, no matter the amount of time that has elapsed…

  3. Their is also a case in Tasmania where a lady who had been arrested for not wearing a mask into a shop and spent 2 weeks in prison. Bailed to appear in court in April was the same refused entry to court for not wearing a mask. That was the preliminary hearing ….hearing set for May…I presume the same thing will happen.

  4. So just an inconsistency I noticed already, so if the two accused were not allowed to appear while they were trying to gain entry legally, yet the same court allowed an “emergency barrister appear by phone”, how is that justice being served, as it’s clear to me at least a kangaroo court setup situation!!

  5. The photo of the queen is still hanging in the office, she is no longer the queen of this country, WHY? because Phizer bought this nation decades ago while pple were sleeping or numbing down fro US tv shows. Shame on us, that not one is talking about this. The leaders of all states have committed TREASON, why are you still quiet…?

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Ivan M. Paton on Approval Of Remdesivir
Beth on Free and Fair?
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Victorian Change to Mandates
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Health care in crisis
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Health care in crisis
Burnthehousedown on Postal vote outrage
Shanthini Balasuriyar on Queensland CHO – a law unto himself
Billie Hutton on Convoy to Canberra Two
Lynn a freedom warrior on Convoy to Canberra Two
Elizabeth on Ruble on the rise
Yvonne Ford on Pfizer drug recall
Gene Trevor Wyngaard on NZ Scrap vaccine mandates
Frances Mahy on Russia Sanctions The U.S.A
Peter Coxhead on My Story, So Far
Theodora Zajaz on Novak Out Of U.S. Open.
Leonie Young on Probuild Buy-Out
Shelley Madden on Pfizer, Stranger than Fiction
Debra Mullins on AVN vs Brendan Murphy
Malcolm on The End Game
Sabina on What’s Next?
Drew Duncan on Belarus Under Threat
Robyn on What’s Next?
Sofia Rutteman on Here We Go Again, Part 2
Robert Burns on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Kim Henry on Pfizer Whistleblower
Lee Y on Give Me Five
Linda Nemeth on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Warwick Hibble on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Lesley on The Data Is Ours
Patricia Poppeliers on Here We Go Again, Part 2
Dani Stevens on Trouble in Paradise
Colin Stevens on VICTORY FOR THE PEOPLE
Leanne Robyn on VICTORY FOR THE PEOPLE
Dianedraytonbuckland on Facebook: Judge, Jury and Executioner
Michael Chere on Before You Inject Your Child
Kerry Taylor on Which one of us is blind?
Kathy Hirsch on First Nations Locked Down
Gloria Feather on Undermining The Indigenous.
Marie Millikin on Let us talk about intuition.
Lucienne Helm on Let us talk about intuition.
Susan Wilson on The real revolution
Jennifer Leonard on 2020 a year to forget
F J on Strange Times
Tracey Parsons on IBAC DAY 9
stacie rose on Which one of us is blind?
Uncertainty on My Story, So Far
Tracey on A Veteran’s Plea
Zaidee Lens Van Rijn on My Story, So Far
Alissandra Moon on The Rise of Medical Apartheid
Peggy Gothe on Mum, I don’t feel well
Keith Cashman on Mum, I don’t feel well
Melinda c Taylor on Mum, I don’t feel well
Vaughan Oke on Which one of us is blind?
Jane Ramsay on Choice vs Ultimatum
Brian K Wilson on Which one of us is blind?
Scott Dawson on Which one of us is blind?
Sandra Dee on ST KILDA STREET PICNIC