Thursday, June 30, 2022
Google search engine
HomeNationalNTDarwin shooter sacks another legal team after claiming ‘coercion’ to guilty plea.

Darwin shooter sacks another legal team after claiming ‘coercion’ to guilty plea.


We are 100% independently owned, free from corporate ownership and control. Help support a free press by donating to us.

On 5 June 2019, the quiet of Darwin was shattered by a killing rampage through the city centre. The carnage that followed left four men dead and one woman injured after the alleged killer, Benjamin Hoffmann went on a shooting rampage. The suspect was already well known to police, was on parole and was wearing a monitoring bracelet at the time of the incidents. Reports at the time suggested Hoffmann had been searching for a man he believed was in a ‘secret relationship’ with his then girlfriend.

Following the shooting, Hoffmann was reported to have apologised to the court saying he was “very sorry about what’s happened.”

Hoffmann plead guilty to three counts of murder and one of manslaughter part-way through his 2021 trial. Shortly after, Hoffmann fired his legal team claiming he had no confidence in them. Following this, Hoffmann was granted a second legal team through Legal Aid.

Hoffmann again fired his legal team on 21 April 2022, just weeks before sentencing for the four charges were to be handed down. In response to the latest legal team sacking, Justice Burns stated that, “the reason you are without legal representation is your own fault…you have chosen to dispense with the services of two sets of lawyers who have been subject to grants of legal aid.”

Hoffmann has claimed that the second legal team ‘coerced’ him into pleading guilty to the four murders and further claimed “I’m not guilty, I’m mentally ill”.

Media reports from March 2022 claimed Hoffmann believed there was a “broad-ranging conspiracy relating to an outlaw motorbike group here in Darwin, which is aimed against him, and which seeks to have him convicted and imprisoned”. He also believed the prosecution; his own legal team and Justice Burns were part of this conspiracy.

In explaining his decision to fire the legal team, Hoffmann sought permission to read three ‘crisis’ letters to the court. In the first letter, Hoffmann claimed he had been coerced in to pleading guilty and that due to his high level of medication he should be granted a re-trial. The second letter sought to sack the two senior members of his legal team whilst retaining the services of a third. Justice Burns responded that there was no evidence of misconduct on the part of Hoffmann’s legal team and that due to ethical reasons, the third lawyer, Dr. Peterson, was “unwilling to act on [his] behalf unless there were other lawyers engaged”.

Hoffmann is due to reappear in court on 5 May 2022 for a further directions hearing prior to sentencing currently set down for 27 May 2022. Hoffmann has two weeks to make any further applications to delay sentencing.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Ivan M. Paton on Approval Of Remdesivir
Beth on Free and Fair?
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Victorian Change to Mandates
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Health care in crisis
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Health care in crisis
Burnthehousedown on Postal vote outrage
Shanthini Balasuriyar on Queensland CHO – a law unto himself
Billie Hutton on Convoy to Canberra Two
Lynn a freedom warrior on Convoy to Canberra Two
Elizabeth on Ruble on the rise
Yvonne Ford on Pfizer drug recall
Gene Trevor Wyngaard on NZ Scrap vaccine mandates
Frances Mahy on Russia Sanctions The U.S.A
Peter Coxhead on My Story, So Far
Theodora Zajaz on Novak Out Of U.S. Open.
Leonie Young on Probuild Buy-Out
Shelley Madden on Pfizer, Stranger than Fiction
Debra Mullins on AVN vs Brendan Murphy
Malcolm on The End Game
Sabina on What’s Next?
Drew Duncan on Belarus Under Threat
Robyn on What’s Next?
Sofia Rutteman on Here We Go Again, Part 2
Robert Burns on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Kim Henry on Pfizer Whistleblower
Lee Y on Give Me Five
Linda Nemeth on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Warwick Hibble on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Lesley on The Data Is Ours
Patricia Poppeliers on Here We Go Again, Part 2
Dani Stevens on Trouble in Paradise
Dianedraytonbuckland on Facebook: Judge, Jury and Executioner
Michael Chere on Before You Inject Your Child
Kerry Taylor on Which one of us is blind?
Kathy Hirsch on First Nations Locked Down
Gloria Feather on Undermining The Indigenous.
Marie Millikin on Let us talk about intuition.
Lucienne Helm on Let us talk about intuition.
Susan Wilson on The real revolution
Jennifer Leonard on 2020 a year to forget
F J on Strange Times
Tracey Parsons on IBAC DAY 9
stacie rose on Which one of us is blind?
Uncertainty on My Story, So Far
Tracey on A Veteran’s Plea
Zaidee Lens Van Rijn on My Story, So Far
Alissandra Moon on The Rise of Medical Apartheid
Peggy Gothe on Mum, I don’t feel well
Keith Cashman on Mum, I don’t feel well
Melinda c Taylor on Mum, I don’t feel well
Vaughan Oke on Which one of us is blind?
Jane Ramsay on Choice vs Ultimatum
Brian K Wilson on Which one of us is blind?
Scott Dawson on Which one of us is blind?