Friday, July 1, 2022
Google search engine
HomeEditors PickFor the common good: How Covid exposed the war on liberty

For the common good: How Covid exposed the war on liberty


We are 100% independently owned, free from corporate ownership and control. Help support a free press by donating to us.

The pandemic shocked us with a traumatic lesson about cooperation and interdependency. It finally presented the immediate and visceral threat necessary to teach us what had long been laid out on a breadcrumb trail: that when it comes to the well-being of others, an individual’s rights and freedoms take the back seat.

But while some of us were learning about the expendability of our civil liberties for the sake of the common good, others were more wisely aghast at the lesson itself. Indeed, COVID seemed like a master class in tyranny, making a daringly naked case for the end of free will—and it came after decades of careful teaching. 

The pandemic response put a capstone on years of crisis conditioning that consistently pitted personal freedom against the greater good. Since 9/11, every threat to come down the mainstream news cycle seemed to huddle around the same consensus, that some fresh element of our liberty was making the world hurt and that we were selfish to hold on to it.

The war on terror taught us that privacy threatened national security and that submission to the surveillance state was the at-home duty of a good citizen. Next, climate change brought our natural rights into question, teaching us that everything from movement to procreation and consumption only put the world in peril.

In the United States, where gun ownership is a right, a spate of school shootings presented the inevitable conclusion that such a freedom is deadly.

And finally, the social justice crisis inspired a movement that found new and surprising threats hidden in the space between words, putting free speech on permanent trial for its evolving capacity to cause harm.

A strange thing was happening: either we were maturing into a more complex and connected world, and liberty was truly getting in the way, or a vested interest was curating problems and manufacturing solutions that would scapegoat our freedoms.

COVID proved the latter when it gave us a full-monty sales pitch for unwarranted tyranny. It wanted us to drop the whole basket of liberties we, conveniently, had been just taught could hurt us. This time, the line was that privacy, mobility, speech, and (newly) bodily autonomy could kill and not just harm. So we ran towards contact tracing, lockdown, censorship, and coercion.

An unlikely quirk of the virus added in the crucial and repeating element of shame: Since Covid left so many unharmed who could still spread it, resisting the prescribed health measures meant threatening public safety, not just one’s own. So freedom was able to be made into the dirty word of the selfish and the uncaring.

Thus a better plan to poison liberty could not have been written, so we’re left to suspect that this one had been. And from there, we rethink the last twenty years of crises, considering how they unfailingly bent us by increments in the same direction.

We can therefore see the outline of an initiative to commandeer world events, so they act like shock therapy, aimed to wean us off our addiction to freedom. With Covid, the effort went from subtle to frantic, and what could have gone undetected started glowing red. So now we watch the next moves, wide-eyed, perhaps unsure of the ‘who’ and the ‘why,’ but positive they will have nothing to do with “common good.”

Susan Dunham is a talented Canadian writer who can be found on Instagram @susankaydunham



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Ivan M. Paton on Approval Of Remdesivir
Beth on Free and Fair?
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Victorian Change to Mandates
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Health care in crisis
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Health care in crisis
Burnthehousedown on Postal vote outrage
Shanthini Balasuriyar on Queensland CHO – a law unto himself
Billie Hutton on Convoy to Canberra Two
Lynn a freedom warrior on Convoy to Canberra Two
Elizabeth on Ruble on the rise
Yvonne Ford on Pfizer drug recall
Gene Trevor Wyngaard on NZ Scrap vaccine mandates
Frances Mahy on Russia Sanctions The U.S.A
Peter Coxhead on My Story, So Far
Theodora Zajaz on Novak Out Of U.S. Open.
Leonie Young on Probuild Buy-Out
Shelley Madden on Pfizer, Stranger than Fiction
Debra Mullins on AVN vs Brendan Murphy
Malcolm on The End Game
Sabina on What’s Next?
Drew Duncan on Belarus Under Threat
Robyn on What’s Next?
Sofia Rutteman on Here We Go Again, Part 2
Robert Burns on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Kim Henry on Pfizer Whistleblower
Lee Y on Give Me Five
Linda Nemeth on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Warwick Hibble on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Lesley on The Data Is Ours
Patricia Poppeliers on Here We Go Again, Part 2
Dani Stevens on Trouble in Paradise
Dianedraytonbuckland on Facebook: Judge, Jury and Executioner
Michael Chere on Before You Inject Your Child
Kerry Taylor on Which one of us is blind?
Kathy Hirsch on First Nations Locked Down
Gloria Feather on Undermining The Indigenous.
Marie Millikin on Let us talk about intuition.
Lucienne Helm on Let us talk about intuition.
Susan Wilson on The real revolution
Jennifer Leonard on 2020 a year to forget
F J on Strange Times
Tracey Parsons on IBAC DAY 9
stacie rose on Which one of us is blind?
Uncertainty on My Story, So Far
Tracey on A Veteran’s Plea
Zaidee Lens Van Rijn on My Story, So Far
Alissandra Moon on The Rise of Medical Apartheid
Peggy Gothe on Mum, I don’t feel well
Keith Cashman on Mum, I don’t feel well
Melinda c Taylor on Mum, I don’t feel well
Vaughan Oke on Which one of us is blind?
Jane Ramsay on Choice vs Ultimatum
Brian K Wilson on Which one of us is blind?
Scott Dawson on Which one of us is blind?