Thursday, June 30, 2022
Google search engine
HomeScienceIs cloud seeding responsible for the increased rain we are witnessing?

Is cloud seeding responsible for the increased rain we are witnessing?


We are 100% independently owned, free from corporate ownership and control. Help support a free press by donating to us.

In 2011 Colin Ward authored an article for CSIROpedia about Cloud seeding. He talked about how Taffy Bowen and his staff at the Division of Radiophysics searched for work of interest to themselves and importance to Australia after the end of the second World War. One of the thing Bowen took interest in was cloud and rain physics which he began and led until 1971 when he retired.

Ward’s article says, “Today, CSIRO uses the lessons learnt from their cloud seeding experiments to develop better models for weather forecasting and changes in climate.” And then he talks about USA researchers I Langmuir and V Schaefer who reported in 1946 that rain could be induced by seeding clouds with dry ice.

There has been much speculation around this topic on various social media platforms. Many people do not even believe it is possible to induce rainfall – but with this article, I hope to shed some light on the reality of what is going on.

Firstly, there are several organisations that practice cloud seeding, and there are varying methods used. A trial was conducted by Taffy Bowen’s team in Eastern New South Wales, in Australia using RAAF aircraft on February 5th, 1947. On the day, the trial was carried out, there was deep cumulus cloud coverage, where all the clouds appeared similar in type and size and covered the country inland from Sydney. After the plane dumped dry ice into the cloud, rainfall took merely minutes to commence, and the rain lasted several hours with more than twelve millimetres over an area of 80 square kilometres – The surrounding clouds did not have rainfall from them, and this experiment is believed to be the first documented trial.

In 1947 a systematic program of cloud seeding was initiated, and it continued for twenty-four years. The Division focussed their work on airborne investigations of cloud structure and reaction, theoretical and laboratory but the biggest difficulty faced was that nothing definitive could be proven since there was no way to know how much rain a cloud would have produced had the seeding not been done – however, with repetitious experimenting, eventually it was proven because the rain continued to increase.

The Division of Cloud Physics and the State Departments of Agriculture worked side by side in the cloud seeding research and public meetings were held before the commencement of any program to give the people a voice on the subject. The Division still received letters from angry landowners blaming the experiments for unwanted downpours.

In 2018, an article written by Kate Doyle about cloud seeding was posted on ABC News. One quote from her article is “Cloud seeding is the process of adding chemicals to clouds to increase rainfall.”

She also mentions that Hydro Tasmania conducted cloud seeding in the lead-up to deadly flooding in north-western Tasmania.

One must wonder, if it has been done for this long, they would have surely refined the methods they use, and so the elephant sitting in the room is one that must be spoken about… in what way have their rain seeds impacted the current floods in NSW and QLD?



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Ivan M. Paton on Approval Of Remdesivir
Beth on Free and Fair?
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Victorian Change to Mandates
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Health care in crisis
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Health care in crisis
Burnthehousedown on Postal vote outrage
Shanthini Balasuriyar on Queensland CHO – a law unto himself
Billie Hutton on Convoy to Canberra Two
Lynn a freedom warrior on Convoy to Canberra Two
Elizabeth on Ruble on the rise
Yvonne Ford on Pfizer drug recall
Gene Trevor Wyngaard on NZ Scrap vaccine mandates
Frances Mahy on Russia Sanctions The U.S.A
Peter Coxhead on My Story, So Far
Theodora Zajaz on Novak Out Of U.S. Open.
Leonie Young on Probuild Buy-Out
Shelley Madden on Pfizer, Stranger than Fiction
Debra Mullins on AVN vs Brendan Murphy
Malcolm on The End Game
Sabina on What’s Next?
Drew Duncan on Belarus Under Threat
Robyn on What’s Next?
Sofia Rutteman on Here We Go Again, Part 2
Robert Burns on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Kim Henry on Pfizer Whistleblower
Lee Y on Give Me Five
Linda Nemeth on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Warwick Hibble on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Lesley on The Data Is Ours
Patricia Poppeliers on Here We Go Again, Part 2
Dani Stevens on Trouble in Paradise
Dianedraytonbuckland on Facebook: Judge, Jury and Executioner
Michael Chere on Before You Inject Your Child
Kerry Taylor on Which one of us is blind?
Kathy Hirsch on First Nations Locked Down
Gloria Feather on Undermining The Indigenous.
Marie Millikin on Let us talk about intuition.
Lucienne Helm on Let us talk about intuition.
Susan Wilson on The real revolution
Jennifer Leonard on 2020 a year to forget
F J on Strange Times
Tracey Parsons on IBAC DAY 9
stacie rose on Which one of us is blind?
Uncertainty on My Story, So Far
Tracey on A Veteran’s Plea
Zaidee Lens Van Rijn on My Story, So Far
Alissandra Moon on The Rise of Medical Apartheid
Peggy Gothe on Mum, I don’t feel well
Keith Cashman on Mum, I don’t feel well
Melinda c Taylor on Mum, I don’t feel well
Vaughan Oke on Which one of us is blind?
Jane Ramsay on Choice vs Ultimatum
Brian K Wilson on Which one of us is blind?
Scott Dawson on Which one of us is blind?