Thursday, June 30, 2022
Google search engine
HomeNationalKids “zero to four” added to vaccine injury claims

Kids “zero to four” added to vaccine injury claims


We are 100% independently owned, free from corporate ownership and control. Help support a free press by donating to us.

Health authorities are adding children aged zero to four to Australia’s vaccine injury compensation claims scheme, as health authorities finish defining regulations to administer Covid-19 vaccines to babies and toddlers. Currently no coronavirus vaccines have been approved for children under five in Australia, however Greg Hunt has declared at Tuesday night’s budget meeting that planning is under way for “children aged zero to four.” 

Mr Hunt elucidated his belief that “vaccination against Covid-19 remains the most effective way to prevent severe disease, hospitalisation and death.”

“To date, more than 56 million Covid-19 vaccine doses have been administered around Australia and more than 95 per cent of our population over the age of 16 (more than 19.9 million) have had at least one dose.”

“The government is investing more than $1 billion over two years to ensure continued access to safe and effective vaccines for all eligible people.” Mr Hunt said

“An investment of $690.4 million will see the vaccination program continue until the end of 2022, and ensure we are well prepared should medical advice recommend additional population groups be vaccinated, such as children aged zero to four years.”

Although not mentioned during the budget meeting, it has been noted in the new budget papers that the government had extended the Covid-19 vaccine claims scheme “to include children aged zero to four years and fourth doses for priority cohorts to access compensation for claims related to the administration of Therapeutic Goods Administration approved Covid-19 vaccines”.

The scheme allows citizens who suffer serious adverse reactions to the Covid-19 jabs the ability to claim up to $20,000 for lost income, medical bills, and other expenses. The scheme first started paying out claims earlier this year after more than 10,000 applications were registered.

To meet the requirements applicants must have sustained at the very least $1000 in losses, spent at minimum of one night in hospital as well as being able to provide evidence from a GP that the vaccine “was linked in medical documentation to the injury or harm related to a condition identified by the TGA”.

Also noted in the budget is that “the scheme will also provide compensation where the injury or harm caused or materially contributed to death.”

“Claims of $20,000 or more will be assessed by a panel of independent experts and compensation paid based on its recommendations.”

The scheme has been criticised by legal experts who have raised concerns that it is overly complex and only narrowly focused on a minimal number of adverse reactions, officially recognised by the medicine’s regulator. It is also suggested that the evidence thresholds are too steep as many doctors are unwilling to attribute health issues to the vaccines.

The federal government has also provided protection for vaccines manufacturers including Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca and Novavax “covering certain liabilities that could result from the use of the vaccines” but refrains from putting a dollar amount on the potential claims.

The budget papers also expressed “the financial implications of the Covid-19 treatment purchases and the Covid-19 Vaccine Claims Scheme are not for publication due to commercial sensitivities”.

During the press release it was also noted that an additional $200,000 was being assigned to “enable cardiac MRI for myocarditis to continue for a further six months.

Last year the Government temporarily added magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose myocarditis post Covid-19 vaccinations to the Medicare Benefits Schedule.

Myocarditis and pericarditis – inflammation of the heart muscle and inflammation of the lining around the heart – are known side effects associated with Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines occurring in every 1 in 10,000 administered doses currently, according to the TGA’s statistics.

It was announced last week that the government had secured a multibillion-dollar agreement with Moderna to construct a mRNA production facility in Melbourne, with the capacity to produce one hundred million doses annually.

Budget papers state that “the facility will be based in Victoria and will provide Australia with priority access to mRNA vaccines, and support research and development and domestic preparedness for possible future pandemics.”

“Funding for this measure is not for publication due to commercial-in-confidence sensitivities.”

Of the $1 billion of funding for vaccine distribution and uptake, $800.8 million will be allocated towards the “administration of primary and booster doses in primary care settings, pharmacies, aged and disability care facilities, and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and culturally and linguistically diverse communities”.

$172.9 million will be assigned to “implementation, monitoring, communications and reporting of the vaccine rollout, including digital and non-digital capabilities and expert advisory services”, and $69.3 million will be earmarked to the National Partnership on Covid-19 Response.

Additional purchases of Covid-19 treatments under advanced purchase agreements “on the advice of the Science and Industry Technical Advisory Group” have also been made.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Ivan M. Paton on Approval Of Remdesivir
Beth on Free and Fair?
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Victorian Change to Mandates
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Health care in crisis
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Health care in crisis
Burnthehousedown on Postal vote outrage
Shanthini Balasuriyar on Queensland CHO – a law unto himself
Billie Hutton on Convoy to Canberra Two
Lynn a freedom warrior on Convoy to Canberra Two
Elizabeth on Ruble on the rise
Yvonne Ford on Pfizer drug recall
Gene Trevor Wyngaard on NZ Scrap vaccine mandates
Frances Mahy on Russia Sanctions The U.S.A
Peter Coxhead on My Story, So Far
Theodora Zajaz on Novak Out Of U.S. Open.
Leonie Young on Probuild Buy-Out
Shelley Madden on Pfizer, Stranger than Fiction
Debra Mullins on AVN vs Brendan Murphy
Malcolm on The End Game
Sabina on What’s Next?
Drew Duncan on Belarus Under Threat
Robyn on What’s Next?
Sofia Rutteman on Here We Go Again, Part 2
Robert Burns on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Kim Henry on Pfizer Whistleblower
Lee Y on Give Me Five
Linda Nemeth on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Warwick Hibble on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Lesley on The Data Is Ours
Patricia Poppeliers on Here We Go Again, Part 2
Dani Stevens on Trouble in Paradise
Dianedraytonbuckland on Facebook: Judge, Jury and Executioner
Michael Chere on Before You Inject Your Child
Kerry Taylor on Which one of us is blind?
Kathy Hirsch on First Nations Locked Down
Gloria Feather on Undermining The Indigenous.
Marie Millikin on Let us talk about intuition.
Lucienne Helm on Let us talk about intuition.
Susan Wilson on The real revolution
Jennifer Leonard on 2020 a year to forget
F J on Strange Times
Tracey Parsons on IBAC DAY 9
stacie rose on Which one of us is blind?
Uncertainty on My Story, So Far
Tracey on A Veteran’s Plea
Zaidee Lens Van Rijn on My Story, So Far
Alissandra Moon on The Rise of Medical Apartheid
Peggy Gothe on Mum, I don’t feel well
Keith Cashman on Mum, I don’t feel well
Melinda c Taylor on Mum, I don’t feel well
Vaughan Oke on Which one of us is blind?
Jane Ramsay on Choice vs Ultimatum
Brian K Wilson on Which one of us is blind?
Scott Dawson on Which one of us is blind?