Monday, July 4, 2022
Google search engine
HomeWorldAsia-PacificNZ farmers could be taxed on their cow’s indiscretions

NZ farmers could be taxed on their cow’s indiscretions


We are 100% independently owned, free from corporate ownership and control. Help support a free press by donating to us.

New Zealand’s government is proposing to charge farmers for their cattle’s bodily emissions, stating that the methane gas expelled is one of the major causes of climate change, not far behind the effects of carbon dioxide.

New Zealand is well known for its livestock industry, with sheep and cows believed to outnumber people. Authorities are now suggesting these animals that emit powerful greenhouse gases through both their rear and mouth orifices need to be held accountable, and their owners must be the ones that pay.

As part of the system of selling tradable emission credits, the government proposes that livestock farmers buy credits for the methane their animals produce.

“There is no question that we need to cut the amount of methane we are putting into the atmosphere, and an effective emissions pricing system for agriculture will play a key part in how we achieve that.” Said James Shaw, NZ’s climate change minister.

Methane is believed to be the second most rampant greenhouse gas in the world. It causes more warming than carbon after its release before dissipating into the atmosphere at a quicker rate, leaving the NZ government seeing it as essential to lower its emissions.

The proposed new ruling would mean farmers must pay for their livestock emissions as early as 2025.

The methane emitted directly by livestock accounts for around 5.5 per cent of greenhouse gases from human interaction. However, all livestock’s total greenhouse gas emissions, including manure storage and other processes, are believed to add up to 14.5 per cent of all global emissions.

As ludicrous as the plan sounds, there are at least incentives for farmers to try to reduce the emissions, such as a particular dietary plan that boycotts grain and grass and feeds the animals seaweed, which is believed to reduce methane production.

The planting of trees is also an incentive that has been put forward.

However, these incentives, as simple as they may seem, would be costly to the farmer and create additional work in what already is a labour-intensive and often thankless industry.

So the question should be asked – where does this new climate tax money go? 

The proposed new tax would be invested in livestock farmers’ research, development and advisory services. Still, the downside is that it would make all livestock products considerably more expensive due to the additional tax and labour involved. It would also add to the cost of wool, and other livestock uses and possibly cause a crippling ripple effect on the industry that would be near impossible to undo.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Ivan M. Paton on Approval Of Remdesivir
Beth on Free and Fair?
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Victorian Change to Mandates
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Health care in crisis
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Health care in crisis
Burnthehousedown on Postal vote outrage
Shanthini Balasuriyar on Queensland CHO – a law unto himself
Billie Hutton on Convoy to Canberra Two
Lynn a freedom warrior on Convoy to Canberra Two
Elizabeth on Ruble on the rise
Yvonne Ford on Pfizer drug recall
Gene Trevor Wyngaard on NZ Scrap vaccine mandates
Frances Mahy on Russia Sanctions The U.S.A
Peter Coxhead on My Story, So Far
Theodora Zajaz on Novak Out Of U.S. Open.
Leonie Young on Probuild Buy-Out
Shelley Madden on Pfizer, Stranger than Fiction
Debra Mullins on AVN vs Brendan Murphy
Malcolm on The End Game
Sabina on What’s Next?
Drew Duncan on Belarus Under Threat
Robyn on What’s Next?
Sofia Rutteman on Here We Go Again, Part 2
Robert Burns on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Kim Henry on Pfizer Whistleblower
Lee Y on Give Me Five
Linda Nemeth on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Warwick Hibble on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Lesley on The Data Is Ours
Patricia Poppeliers on Here We Go Again, Part 2
Dani Stevens on Trouble in Paradise
Dianedraytonbuckland on Facebook: Judge, Jury and Executioner
Michael Chere on Before You Inject Your Child
Kerry Taylor on Which one of us is blind?
Kathy Hirsch on First Nations Locked Down
Gloria Feather on Undermining The Indigenous.
Marie Millikin on Let us talk about intuition.
Lucienne Helm on Let us talk about intuition.
Susan Wilson on The real revolution
Jennifer Leonard on 2020 a year to forget
F J on Strange Times
Tracey Parsons on IBAC DAY 9
stacie rose on Which one of us is blind?
Uncertainty on My Story, So Far
Tracey on A Veteran’s Plea
Zaidee Lens Van Rijn on My Story, So Far
Alissandra Moon on The Rise of Medical Apartheid
Peggy Gothe on Mum, I don’t feel well
Keith Cashman on Mum, I don’t feel well
Melinda c Taylor on Mum, I don’t feel well
Vaughan Oke on Which one of us is blind?
Jane Ramsay on Choice vs Ultimatum
Brian K Wilson on Which one of us is blind?
Scott Dawson on Which one of us is blind?