Monday, July 4, 2022
Google search engine
HomeOpinionPandemic Prolonged by Mass Vaccination - Demonisation of Unvaccinated No Scientific Basis,...

Pandemic Prolonged by Mass Vaccination – Demonisation of Unvaccinated No Scientific Basis, Cruel and Heartless

WE NEED FUNDS TO FIGHT MAINSTREAM MEDIA MISINFORMATION

We are 100% independently owned, free from corporate ownership and control. Help support a free press by donating to us.

For two years it has been spruiked by world governments, mainstream media, and a multitude of other mouthpieces for the global New World Order being pushed by technocrats and the elite cabal, that the only way out of the COVID-19 global pandemic and all the horrors that have come about because of it is mass vaccination.

It was reported on Republicworld.com on December 1st, 2021, that the United Nations (UN) Secretary-General, António Guterres had alleged, “the only way out of a global pandemic – and out of this unjust and immoral situation – is through a global vaccination plan.”

This confirmed that the vaccination roll-out, which was set out as a strategy by the World Health Organisation (WHO), was supported by the UN. They aimed to inoculate 40% of people in all the nations by the end of 2021, and a total of 70% by the middle of 2022, even though the so-called vaccines were untested, only approved for emergency use, and had been rushed to market at lightning speed with their trial periods ending in April 2023.

In an article on Spectator Australia titled “Did we make things worse?” dated May 2nd, 2022, Jean Curthoys talks about how the vaccination rollout, on the surface appeared to be a feasible thing to do. “It has been repeatedly and forcefully endorsed by public health officials and medical experts.” She wrote.

The rollout of vaccines was parallel to a massive blanket campaign by governments and mainstream media outlets alike, globally designed to convince the public to partake in a medical experiment, and the majority of people have allegedly gone along with the narrative and complied with the requests happily. But a number of people who do not partake in the spruiking and propaganda the governments and mainstream media outlets are offering, have become aware of the medical issues and the death toll that has skyrocketed since the vaccine rollout.

Unfortunately, the people who refuse to follow the main narrative based on the evidence they have uncovered have been subjected to bullying, accusations of selfishness and stupidity, discrimination, ‘anti-scientism’ and other harsh treatments by those who partook in the world’s largest ‘medical experiment’. This discrimination is purportedly not unjust or illegal in the eyes of the governments who are also complicit in the behaviour against those who exercised their democratic rights to refuse the medical experiment.

In varying degrees around the globe, the unvaccinated have been ostracised and some of the vaccinated individuals have even expressed fear toward the unvaccinated claiming the unvaccinated might make them sick!

The unvaccinated have not held back in their judgement of those who have judged them.

The unvaccinated are somewhat confused as to how people who have previously been sceptical of governmental integrity and of Big Pharma have been so keen to believe the narrative being fed to them, and so willing to have something untested injected into their veins. This confusion and frustration has led to the term ‘sheeple’ being used to describe those who blindly follow authority. This is somewhat reminiscent of George Orwell’s 1984, where two conflicting and contradictory beliefs are being held by the vaccinated people that a) the vaccines are safe, effective, and protective, and b) those who have not taken part in being injected with the vaccines pose a life and death risk to them.

Dr Robert M. Rennebohm, MD has composed a 119-page open letter to parents and paediatricians regarding COVID-19 vaccination. With the letter he hopes to pass on what he has learnt about the complexities of the human immune system, to help ease the burden of the strain being caused by the destruction of relationships, families, and friendships by all that is going on.

On the first page of the letter, Dr Rennebohm asks, “Does COVID vaccination give children the healthiest possible future; does it best protect the vulnerable? Or would a different approach to the pandemic give children a better future and better protect the vulnerable?”

“The letter has been received as a masterpiece exposition of a highly complex subject.” writes Curthoys.

Rennebohm’s introduction outlines the conflicting viewpoints: the main narrative – get vaccinated, alternative narrative – stop the vaccines, they’re dangerous.

He outlines children could not give informed consent to the COVID vaccines. They are entirely dependent on their parents or guardians to choose for them. He goes on to point out that, “Ethically, experimental pharmaceutical products, particularly experimental vaccines that have been rushed into use before adequate testing for safety could be completed, must not be administered to anyone, particularly children, without adequate informed consent.”

Ultimately, the two opposing sides to the argument about vaccinations are not communicating with each other. They are both failing to address the foundations of the issues at hand.

The question ‘is mass vaccination the ‘only way’ out of the pandemic?’ cannot be truly answered by any person without some real comprehension of virology and immunology, which cannot be within grasp without understanding basic science.

The counter-narrative that is queried by Rennebohm in his letter has been evolved by Geert Vanden Bossche.

Vanden Bossche is a world-renowned independent virologist and vaccine expert who has previously been employed by the likes of GAVI and The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Vanden Bossche studied at Ghent University and did his M.D. in Veterinary Medicine from 1980 to 1983, then he went on to obtain his post-doctoral training at the Free University of Berlin from 1984 to 1987, studying Equine Medicine and Surgery. He also studied a postdoctoral Fellowship in Virology at James A. Baker Institute for Animal Health, Cornell University in New York, was board certified in Veterinary Virology in 1990 and board-certified in Veterinary Microbiology and Animal Hygiene two years later.

Geert Vanden Bossche is well known to those who have delved into the investigations; down the rabbit hole so to speak. Despite his knowledge and his good name, he has been vilified by mainstream media and accused of spreading misinformation.

Vanden Bossche passionately argued in his thesis that using imperfect vaccines to mass vaccinate in the middle of a pandemic has been and will continue to be a disaster. Imperfect vaccines are the only type of vaccines that exist for respiratory viruses. He claims in his open letter that it is a counterproductive strategy, both for individuals as well as for the course the pandemic is taking.

These vaccines erode natural immunity and therefore make it more likely for vaccinated individuals to become sick, according to Vanden Bossche.

Rennebohm alleges that science suggests that Vanden Bossche could be right about this confronting idea. The argument has scientific support even though the main narrative says otherwise.

The main narrative is pushing that the world is now having a pandemic of unvaccinated individuals, but evidence and science suggest the opposite is true. The pandemic has been strung out and dragged on because of the mass vaccination process and had the majority of the world’s population remained unvaccinated, the general health of the people globally would have been better off.

Vanden Bossche’s analysis is widely supported by the experience of the past couple of years, and despite his argument, and that of others who argue the same conclusions, the main narrative refuses to address this, concluding that things would have been far worse had the vaccinations not been rolled out – this conclusion, of course, cannot be verified!

Rennebohm’s intention with his open letter was to raise awareness about Vanden Bossche’s work to the public, with his main objective to put genuine and accessible information regarding ‘informed consent’ out there.

Vindication is provided to the unvaccinated people in the open letter, also shining a light on a broader hope for some sort of reconciliation for those whose family units, friendships and relationships have broken down; been disrupted and soured.

RELATED ARTICLES

1 COMMENT

  1. What started as “You all need a vaccine to be protected from Covid’, and then “You all need a 2nd shot of the vaccine to be protected from Covid’ and then “You all need a 3rd shot to be protected from Covid” and then “You will all need a 4th shot to be protected”. WAKE UP – if the first 3 don’t work, WHY does anybody think future boosters WILL work? No more “and then”. Once the Government has you on their “Vaccine Merry-Go-Round” there is NO getting off.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Ivan M. Paton on Approval Of Remdesivir
Beth on Free and Fair?
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Victorian Change to Mandates
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Health care in crisis
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Health care in crisis
Burnthehousedown on Postal vote outrage
Shanthini Balasuriyar on Queensland CHO – a law unto himself
Billie Hutton on Convoy to Canberra Two
Lynn a freedom warrior on Convoy to Canberra Two
Elizabeth on Ruble on the rise
Yvonne Ford on Pfizer drug recall
Gene Trevor Wyngaard on NZ Scrap vaccine mandates
Frances Mahy on Russia Sanctions The U.S.A
Peter Coxhead on My Story, So Far
Theodora Zajaz on Novak Out Of U.S. Open.
Leonie Young on Probuild Buy-Out
Shelley Madden on Pfizer, Stranger than Fiction
Debra Mullins on AVN vs Brendan Murphy
Malcolm on The End Game
Sabina on What’s Next?
Drew Duncan on Belarus Under Threat
Robyn on What’s Next?
Sofia Rutteman on Here We Go Again, Part 2
Robert Burns on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Kim Henry on Pfizer Whistleblower
Lee Y on Give Me Five
Linda Nemeth on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Warwick Hibble on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Lesley on The Data Is Ours
Patricia Poppeliers on Here We Go Again, Part 2
Dani Stevens on Trouble in Paradise
Colin Stevens on VICTORY FOR THE PEOPLE
Leanne Robyn on VICTORY FOR THE PEOPLE
Dianedraytonbuckland on Facebook: Judge, Jury and Executioner
Michael Chere on Before You Inject Your Child
Kerry Taylor on Which one of us is blind?
Kathy Hirsch on First Nations Locked Down
Gloria Feather on Undermining The Indigenous.
Marie Millikin on Let us talk about intuition.
Lucienne Helm on Let us talk about intuition.
Susan Wilson on The real revolution
Jennifer Leonard on 2020 a year to forget
F J on Strange Times
Tracey Parsons on IBAC DAY 9
stacie rose on Which one of us is blind?
Uncertainty on My Story, So Far
Tracey on A Veteran’s Plea
Zaidee Lens Van Rijn on My Story, So Far
Alissandra Moon on The Rise of Medical Apartheid
Peggy Gothe on Mum, I don’t feel well
Keith Cashman on Mum, I don’t feel well
Melinda c Taylor on Mum, I don’t feel well
Vaughan Oke on Which one of us is blind?
Jane Ramsay on Choice vs Ultimatum
Brian K Wilson on Which one of us is blind?
Scott Dawson on Which one of us is blind?
Sandra Dee on ST KILDA STREET PICNIC