Thursday, June 30, 2022
Google search engine
HomePhthalates found in food samples from well know Fast Food Chains

Phthalates found in food samples from well know Fast Food Chains

WE NEED FUNDS TO FIGHT MAINSTREAM MEDIA MISINFORMATION

We are 100% independently owned, free from corporate ownership and control. Help support a free press by donating to us.

We all know that fast food is not the healthiest food that we can eat. Many people acknowledge that it is a ‘sometimes food’ due to its high concentrations of sugar and saturated fats and its high energy content. However, most would not realise that some brands of fast food have been found to contain toxic substances known as phthalates.

Both DnBP (di-n-butyl phthalate) and DEHP (di(2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate) are phthalates, which are mainly used as plasticisers; the substances added to plastics, like PVC (polyvinyl chloride). This is done to make the plastic softer, increase its durability, flexibility, transparency, and longevity. The plastics produced are primarily used for food packaging and food contact materials. DnBP is also an ingredient in most nail polish.

A recent study conducted at the Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, USA, and published in the Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, has discovered that fast foods such as hamburgers, chicken nuggets, chicken burritos and cheese pizzas contained phthalates. The food sampled was from popular US fast-food chains McDonald’s, Burger King, Domino’s, Pizza Hut and Chipotle. The method used during the sampling of the food was gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC/MS). This is an analytical method able to identify different substances within a test sample.

The researchers discovered that 81% of the food sampled contained the phthalate DnBP, while 70% of the food sampled contained the phthalate DEHP. Other types of phthalates were also detected in the food samples, however, at a lower percentage.

Human exposure to phthalates such as DnBP and DEHP has been linked to reproductive problems, liver, kidney, and lung damage (asthma) and learning and attention problems in children. DEHP is a well-known male reproductive toxicant and has been shown to cause cryptorchidism (a condition in which one or both testes fail to descend from the abdomen into the scrotum), changes in testicular testosterone levels, altered development of genitals and low sperm count and quality.

The study found that the median average of phthalates found in the fast foods sampled was 2.51 mg/kg, while the maximum amount of phthalate found was 12.4 mg/kg. To put that into perspective, a chicken burrito is said to weigh 669g on average, so it could contain as much 8.3 mg of the phthalate DEHT. The fast foods containing meat were found to have the highest concentrations of phthalates in them.

Current EPA (Environmental Protection Authority) guidelines state that tolerable levels of phthalates consumption for humans are 0.05 mg/kg of body weight per day. That means for an 80 kg adult, they could tolerably consume 4 mg/day, while the level for a 20 kg young child would mean that consuming only 1 mg/day of phthalates is tolerable. The difference between what is tolerable for a child and an adult obviously varies considerable due to children being smaller and weighing less than adults in general. The chicken burrito that contained 8.3 mg of phthalates would therefore exceed the EPA guideline of a tolerable amount for both adults and children. The amount in the chicken burrito is a whopping 8 times what is tolerable for a young child, compared to the adult, which is 2 times what is tolerable for them to ingest in a day.

The EPA guidelines state that toxic levels of phthalates for humans are 4.8 mg/kg body weight. So, the toxic level for an 80 kg adult would be 384 mg/day and a 20 kg child would be 96 mg/day.

The study looked at the concentrations of phthalates in the gloves used by the food handlers at the fast-food outlets, however, the results did not indicate that the gloves were the only source of phthalates in the food sampled. The question then needs to be asked, how is the phthalates getting into the fast food? And, if it is so damaging to humans, why is it even allowed to be used in the production of plastics that come into direct contact with our food supply?

This body of evidence from the study, has prompted a consumer push for phthalate-free products and regulatory actions to limit the use of phthalates in commercial products in the USA. Unfortunately, very little about phthalates has been mentioned in Australia and is potentially reminiscent of its comparatively slow banning of BPA (bisphenol A) plastics in 2010. (Japan banned BPA plastic in 2003).

There are safer alternative substances available that can be used instead of DEHP and DnBD to plasticize PVC. One such alternative is ATBC (acetyl tri-n-butyl citrate) which is derived from citric acid and was listed in the Phthalates Action Plan of 2012 from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This same document says that the EPA is concerned about phthalates because of their toxicity and the evidence of pervasive human and environmental exposure to them. It promises to take action as part of a coordinated approach with the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).  The recent study mentioned above was conducted earlier this year in 2021; so possibly some action on this problem is now long overdue.

The Commonwealth Government here in Australia, has committed to phase out single use plastic packaging by December 2022. This is certainly a step in the right direction; however, Australia should also be conducting their own research into the fast food served here to determine what levels of phthalates are present.

There is a significant level of fast-food consumption in Australia, with McDonalds apparently having more than 1.7 million customers in Australia every day. According to a Money Australia survey conducted this year, one hundred and forty thousand McDonalds Big Mac burgers are sold in Australia every day. The average weight of a Big Mac is 240g and could contain as much as 0.528 mg of phthalate DEHT. This would give a child half their tolerable amount of phthalate for that day. Another question that also needs to be asked, how is it even decided what constitutes a tolerable amount of phthalate for human consumption? Surely any level of toxic poison in our food is too much.

RELATED ARTICLES

1 COMMENT

  1. Yep, that makes sense, im asthmatic for 70 years, very rarely do takeaway meals. Found I got chesty and headachy after….
    Unvaxed and sataying healthy!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Ivan M. Paton on Approval Of Remdesivir
Beth on Free and Fair?
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Victorian Change to Mandates
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Health care in crisis
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Health care in crisis
Burnthehousedown on Postal vote outrage
Shanthini Balasuriyar on Queensland CHO – a law unto himself
Billie Hutton on Convoy to Canberra Two
Lynn a freedom warrior on Convoy to Canberra Two
Elizabeth on Ruble on the rise
Yvonne Ford on Pfizer drug recall
Gene Trevor Wyngaard on NZ Scrap vaccine mandates
Frances Mahy on Russia Sanctions The U.S.A
Peter Coxhead on My Story, So Far
Theodora Zajaz on Novak Out Of U.S. Open.
Leonie Young on Probuild Buy-Out
Shelley Madden on Pfizer, Stranger than Fiction
Debra Mullins on AVN vs Brendan Murphy
Malcolm on The End Game
Sabina on What’s Next?
Drew Duncan on Belarus Under Threat
Robyn on What’s Next?
Sofia Rutteman on Here We Go Again, Part 2
Robert Burns on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Kim Henry on Pfizer Whistleblower
Lee Y on Give Me Five
Linda Nemeth on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Warwick Hibble on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Lesley on The Data Is Ours
Patricia Poppeliers on Here We Go Again, Part 2
Dani Stevens on Trouble in Paradise
Colin Stevens on VICTORY FOR THE PEOPLE
Leanne Robyn on VICTORY FOR THE PEOPLE
Dianedraytonbuckland on Facebook: Judge, Jury and Executioner
Michael Chere on Before You Inject Your Child
Kerry Taylor on Which one of us is blind?
Kathy Hirsch on First Nations Locked Down
Gloria Feather on Undermining The Indigenous.
Marie Millikin on Let us talk about intuition.
Lucienne Helm on Let us talk about intuition.
Susan Wilson on The real revolution
Jennifer Leonard on 2020 a year to forget
F J on Strange Times
Tracey Parsons on IBAC DAY 9
stacie rose on Which one of us is blind?
Uncertainty on My Story, So Far
Tracey on A Veteran’s Plea
Zaidee Lens Van Rijn on My Story, So Far
Alissandra Moon on The Rise of Medical Apartheid
Peggy Gothe on Mum, I don’t feel well
Keith Cashman on Mum, I don’t feel well
Melinda c Taylor on Mum, I don’t feel well
Vaughan Oke on Which one of us is blind?
Jane Ramsay on Choice vs Ultimatum
Brian K Wilson on Which one of us is blind?
Scott Dawson on Which one of us is blind?
Sandra Dee on ST KILDA STREET PICNIC