Sunday, July 3, 2022
Google search engine
HomeWorldUK Doctors risk being struck off the register for speaking out on...

UK Doctors risk being struck off the register for speaking out on the vaccine and lockdowns

WE NEED FUNDS TO FIGHT MAINSTREAM MEDIA MISINFORMATION

We are 100% independently owned, free from corporate ownership and control. Help support a free press by donating to us.

Changes to the Good Medical Practice Guidance could see UK doctors struck off the register and face regulatory action for publishing misleading information on social media.

A review of the Guidance by the General Medical Council (GMC) has led to the drafting of new regulations which will seek to address toxic cultures in the workplace and regulate doctor’s public and social media communications. Under the proposed guidelines doctors could be sanctioned or see their professional careers jeopardized if found to be guilty of spreading ‘fake news’ on social media platforms.

The GMC has said, the review ‘sets out the standards of patient care and professional behavior expected of all medical professionals registered with us.’

GMC’s chief executive Charlie Massey said, ‘Good medical practice is the bedrock that helps guide ethical practice and supports doctors to provide the best possible care in a world of increasingly complex medicine,’ adding that while the fundamental principles of the guidance remained the same, they had been updated to reflect the modern world.

Massey added ‘We’ve had feedback that doctors want more clarity on using social media. We are already clear that doctors must be honest and trustworthy in their communications and are now emphasizing that this applies to all forms of communication. The principles remain the same whether the communication is written, spoken of via social media.’

If passed, the draft guidance will hold doctors accountable for promoting misleading information across all forms of communication. Doctors will be required to make clear the limits of their knowledge and will be penalized for stepping outside the areas of their expertise. Doctors will be required to be honest and trustworthy in their communications and make reasonable checks to ensure any information they give is not misleading. Online rows and trolling could also place their careers in jeopardy.

The review which plans to make changes to the Medical Guidance and the oath will see a restriction on doctors’ freedom of speech, freedom to question, and force doctors to censorship under the duress of potentially losing their careers.

Other than GMC’s broad statement regarding its guidance criteria it is unclear how the truth will be determined from misinformation or who in fact will make those determinations.

Under the centuries-old Oath, a doctor’s core pledge is to do their best to serve humanity and not intentionally cause harm to their patients. With the threat of being struck off the medical register in conjunction with the prevalence of ‘doctor censorship’ occurring globally across social media platforms, it is feasible that any scrutineering by a regulatory body may be guided by an already established narrative that is consistent with towing the Government line.

At this stage, the UK General Medical Council is calling for feedback on its draft proposal in an open invitation online. The consultation period is set to close on 20 July 2022.

RELATED ARTICLES

2 COMMENTS

  1. Why is there still no free choice of medical firms all over the world. It is the right of every person to choose between this or that doctor, between medical firms. To date, the practice of imposing a medical firms by the state has developed. A semblance of “free choice” has been created in almost every country. The cost of medical services is unreasonably high.This is not a free market and all medicine is de-facto under the control of the state structures all over the world. There is no medical ethics, it was destroyed by the states government organizations. There are instructions that go down to the heads of medical organizations and firms chiefs and it becomes more like a state dictatorship. In many countries, a private person cannot, without the participation of a state institution, make an independent analysis in a laboratory. We are being deceived and the essence of this deception is crazy villains who go against G-D and want to fight the overpopulation of planet Earth with their own methods. Methods such as this, for example, are now being done in China. While the whole world is closely following the events in small Ukraine (where also killed people) – in China people are being killed and killed, brutally killed…

  2. They have been doing this in Australia since the beginning of the scamdemic. AHPRA sent out a document telling doctors, nurses and other health professionals that they risk being deregistered for speaking against the narrative, regardless of personal health circumstances. The positive of this is that we know which doctors really care about the health of their clients. The negative is that those good doctors are now not allowed to practise. The government also paid millions (91M that they openly told us about), to the media.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Ivan M. Paton on Approval Of Remdesivir
Beth on Free and Fair?
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Victorian Change to Mandates
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Health care in crisis
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Health care in crisis
Burnthehousedown on Postal vote outrage
Shanthini Balasuriyar on Queensland CHO – a law unto himself
Billie Hutton on Convoy to Canberra Two
Lynn a freedom warrior on Convoy to Canberra Two
Elizabeth on Ruble on the rise
Yvonne Ford on Pfizer drug recall
Gene Trevor Wyngaard on NZ Scrap vaccine mandates
Frances Mahy on Russia Sanctions The U.S.A
Peter Coxhead on My Story, So Far
Theodora Zajaz on Novak Out Of U.S. Open.
Leonie Young on Probuild Buy-Out
Shelley Madden on Pfizer, Stranger than Fiction
Debra Mullins on AVN vs Brendan Murphy
Malcolm on The End Game
Sabina on What’s Next?
Drew Duncan on Belarus Under Threat
Robyn on What’s Next?
Sofia Rutteman on Here We Go Again, Part 2
Robert Burns on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Kim Henry on Pfizer Whistleblower
Lee Y on Give Me Five
Linda Nemeth on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Warwick Hibble on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Lesley on The Data Is Ours
Patricia Poppeliers on Here We Go Again, Part 2
Dani Stevens on Trouble in Paradise
Colin Stevens on VICTORY FOR THE PEOPLE
Leanne Robyn on VICTORY FOR THE PEOPLE
Dianedraytonbuckland on Facebook: Judge, Jury and Executioner
Michael Chere on Before You Inject Your Child
Kerry Taylor on Which one of us is blind?
Kathy Hirsch on First Nations Locked Down
Gloria Feather on Undermining The Indigenous.
Marie Millikin on Let us talk about intuition.
Lucienne Helm on Let us talk about intuition.
Susan Wilson on The real revolution
Jennifer Leonard on 2020 a year to forget
F J on Strange Times
Tracey Parsons on IBAC DAY 9
stacie rose on Which one of us is blind?
Uncertainty on My Story, So Far
Tracey on A Veteran’s Plea
Zaidee Lens Van Rijn on My Story, So Far
Alissandra Moon on The Rise of Medical Apartheid
Peggy Gothe on Mum, I don’t feel well
Keith Cashman on Mum, I don’t feel well
Melinda c Taylor on Mum, I don’t feel well
Vaughan Oke on Which one of us is blind?
Jane Ramsay on Choice vs Ultimatum
Brian K Wilson on Which one of us is blind?
Scott Dawson on Which one of us is blind?
Sandra Dee on ST KILDA STREET PICNIC