Monday, June 27, 2022
Google search engine
HomeEnvironmentUK government suggests blocking the sun in policy paper to meet the...

UK government suggests blocking the sun in policy paper to meet the conditions of the ‘Paris Agreement’


We are 100% independently owned, free from corporate ownership and control. Help support a free press by donating to us.

At the start of the month on 4 May, the United Kingdom government published a Policy paper titled ‘UK government’s view on greenhouse gas removal technologies and solar radiation management.’

The Policy outlines the government’s view on Greenhouse Gas Removal (GGR) and Solar Radiation Management (SRM), citing these as terms that describe,

” A range of technologies that aim to counteract human-caused climate change by deliberately large-scale intervention in the Earth’s natural systems. They are sometimes referred to as ‘geo-engineering’ or ‘climate engineering.’”

In the paper, the UK government claims its priorities are to tackle the root cause of climate change and reduce emissions caused by human activities, through:

  1. Reducing greenhouse gases by employing Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR)

technologies; and

  • Reflecting some of the sun’s energy back into space using Solar Radiation Management (SRM) technologies.

Examples of the SRM technologies provided by the UK government in the policy paper include the brightening of marine clouds, and the injection of aerosols into the stratosphere, which it claims would be likely to reduce the Earth’s temperature but not reverse ocean acidification. defines Solar Radiation Management as a large category of climate engineering approaches known as Earth Radiation Management (ERM), that mitigate or reverse Global Warming by reflecting sunlight (i.e., solar radiation/shortwave radiation) into space before it is absorbed by the environment and converted into heat.

These SRM approaches include:

Space-based geoengineering to reduce the amount of sunlight that hits the earth;

Stratospheric Aerosol Injection using tiny reflective sulfate particles or aerosols injected into the stratosphere to reflect sunlight;

 Albedo Modification to reduce the surface property of the earth that can reflect or absorb radiation;

Ocean Albedo Modification using microbubbles of air injected into the water that increases the reflectivity or albedo of the ocean’s surface; and

Marine Cloud Brightening that increases the reflectivity of marine clouds by ‘seeding’ them with seawater aerosol.

In the Policy Paper, the UK government states these approaches are needed,

“In order to deliver on the commitment, the UK made by signing the Paris Agreement..”

The UK; which has also legislated for a net-zero emissions target by 2050; will employ these Solar Radiation Management (SRM) technologies to meet the terms of the Paris Agreement.

The Paris Agreement was negotiated and adopted by representatives of 197 parties at the UN Climate Change Conference (COP21) in 2015, and to date, the European Union and 194 states have signed the agreement.

The legally binding agreement is one within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) that aims to limit global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius, preferably to 1.5 degrees Celsius compared to pre-industrial levels, through a number of strategies.

The European Union and 194 states have signed the ‘Paris Agreement’ (Source:

In its goal to meet the terms of the agreement, the UK government has spent over £140.1 million on various collaborative works with Research Councils, the UKRI Strategic Priorities Fund, and the Energy Innovation Programme.

As part of its regulatory review process, the government has consistently supported the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and adopted the decisions made by the CBD’s Conference of Parties (COP), who in 2010 invited parties to the agreement to take a ‘precautionary approach’ on any geoengineering activities that may affect biodiversity until there was adequate scientific evidence to justify such activities.

“At the Montreal Protocol meeting in November 2019, the UK supported a decision asking the Protocol’s Scientific Assessment Panel to assess research related to Solar Radiation Management (SRM), and its potential effect on the stratospheric ozone layer,” the government said.

This assessment will be included in the next Montreal Protocol Quadrennial Assessment report due to be published in 2022.

As part of further supporting information provided in the policy paper to support the UK government’s position, it ‘links in’ the 2015 publication Climate Intervention – Reflecting Sunlight to Cool the Earth.

A 2015 Publication by the National Research Council of the National Academies Sciences, Engineering, and Medicines (Source:

Contributors to the 2015 publication included the National Research Council, Division of Earth and Life Studies, Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, Ocean Studies Board, and the Committee on Geoengineering Climate.

According to the blurb by the National Research Council,

“Climate geoengineering has often been considered to be a ‘last-ditch’ response to climate change, to be used only if climate change damage should produce extreme hardship. Although the likelihood of eventually needing to resort to these efforts grows with every year of inaction on emissions control, there is a lack of information on these ways of potentially intervening in the climate system.”

Yet fast forward seven years to 2022, where the ‘lack of information’ surrounding climate interventions appears to have been resolved, and where ‘climate engineering’ is no longer considered to be a ‘last-ditch’ response.

As the UK works towards ways of reducing global warming and the net-zero targets set by the Paris Agreement, it is full speed ahead with its plan of a large-scale manipulation and modification of the Earth’s natural systems to block the sun’s energy through its ‘geo-engineering’ mechanisms.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Ivan M. Paton on Approval Of Remdesivir
Beth on Free and Fair?
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Victorian Change to Mandates
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Health care in crisis
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Health care in crisis
Burnthehousedown on Postal vote outrage
Shanthini Balasuriyar on Queensland CHO – a law unto himself
Billie Hutton on Convoy to Canberra Two
Lynn a freedom warrior on Convoy to Canberra Two
Elizabeth on Ruble on the rise
Yvonne Ford on Pfizer drug recall
Gene Trevor Wyngaard on NZ Scrap vaccine mandates
Frances Mahy on Russia Sanctions The U.S.A
Peter Coxhead on My Story, So Far
Theodora Zajaz on Novak Out Of U.S. Open.
Leonie Young on Probuild Buy-Out
Shelley Madden on Pfizer, Stranger than Fiction
Debra Mullins on AVN vs Brendan Murphy
Malcolm on The End Game
Sabina on What’s Next?
Drew Duncan on Belarus Under Threat
Robyn on What’s Next?
Sofia Rutteman on Here We Go Again, Part 2
Robert Burns on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Kim Henry on Pfizer Whistleblower
Lee Y on Give Me Five
Linda Nemeth on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Warwick Hibble on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Lesley on The Data Is Ours
Patricia Poppeliers on Here We Go Again, Part 2
Dani Stevens on Trouble in Paradise
Dianedraytonbuckland on Facebook: Judge, Jury and Executioner
Michael Chere on Before You Inject Your Child
Kerry Taylor on Which one of us is blind?
Kathy Hirsch on First Nations Locked Down
Gloria Feather on Undermining The Indigenous.
Marie Millikin on Let us talk about intuition.
Lucienne Helm on Let us talk about intuition.
Susan Wilson on The real revolution
Jennifer Leonard on 2020 a year to forget
F J on Strange Times
Tracey Parsons on IBAC DAY 9
stacie rose on Which one of us is blind?
Uncertainty on My Story, So Far
Tracey on A Veteran’s Plea
Zaidee Lens Van Rijn on My Story, So Far
Alissandra Moon on The Rise of Medical Apartheid
Peggy Gothe on Mum, I don’t feel well
Keith Cashman on Mum, I don’t feel well
Melinda c Taylor on Mum, I don’t feel well
Vaughan Oke on Which one of us is blind?
Jane Ramsay on Choice vs Ultimatum
Brian K Wilson on Which one of us is blind?
Scott Dawson on Which one of us is blind?