Sunday, June 26, 2022
Google search engine
HomeNationalWhy are they still adding fluoride to our water supply?

Why are they still adding fluoride to our water supply?

WE NEED FUNDS TO FIGHT MAINSTREAM MEDIA MISINFORMATION

We are 100% independently owned, free from corporate ownership and control. Help support a free press by donating to us.

Fluoride has been added to our drinking water supply in Australia since the 1960s. The population was told that it would improve the oral health of our nation. Even today, the NSW Government Health website state that many water utilities fluoridate the water supply to protect against tooth decay. They say that it is added in carefully controlled amounts and their levels are monitored to ensure they meet health guidelines.


Meanwhile, there have been several studies highlighting the dangers of humans consuming fluoride, especially concerning the health of children. A study published in the Lancet in 2014, titled Neurobehavioural effect of developmental toxicity, listed fluoride as a developmental neurotoxicant. A developmental neurotoxicant is a substance that damages, destroys, or impairs the function of the central and/or peripheral nervous system. This is then said to cause neurodevelopmental disabilities, including autism, ADHD (attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder), dyslexia, and other cognitive impairments. These affect millions of children worldwide, and some diagnoses seem to be increasing in frequency.


The study also highlights that developmental neurotoxicity causes brain damage that is too often untreatable and frequently permanent. The consequences of such brain damage are that the central nervous system function is impaired and might result in reduced intelligence, or disruption in behaviour. It states that the developing human brain is uniquely vulnerable to toxic chemical exposure, especially in uterio and during infancy and early childhood. The vulnerable nature of the brain during these early stages of life, make them more susceptible to damage, (even at low levels of exposure) compared to an adult brain that would experience little or no damage.


Parents have been scratching their heads for years wondering what has been causing all these disorders in our children. Is the simple answer that these disorders are due to what is being added to our drinking water? The concerning thing is that these studies have been around for many years, and nothing seems to be changing the mindset of our governments with respect to fluoridating our water supply in Australia.


Another study conducted in 2019 and published in JAMA Pediatrics, looked more specifically at the association between maternal fluoride exposure during pregnancy and IQ scores in offspring in Canada. It concluded that higher levels of fluoride exposure during pregnancy were associated with lower IQ scores in children. The study highlighted the fact that fluoride crosses the placenta, with laboratory studies showing that it accumulates in brain regions involved in learning and memory. It also discussed how fluoride alters proteins and neurotransmitters in the central nervous system.


Fluoride consumption has also been linked to skeletal fluorosis (weakening of the bones), kidney problems, arthritis, bone and uterine cancer, immune system suppression, birth defects and gastrointestinal disorders, although the results from the various studies conducted in these areas are mixed. Another health problem that fluoride has been shown to cause is dental fluorosis, which is a defect in tooth enamel. It is caused by ingesting too much fluoride in childhood and results in brown splotches and mottling of the teeth.


Many European countries have rejected the addition of fluoride to their drinking water. Research conducted by the Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology in 2007 claims that in general, the citizens of Europe felt that dental health was an issue to be dealt with at the level of the individual, rather than a solution to be imposed on the entire population. They accepted that while some children may not be encouraged to brush their teeth, they thought this should be addressed directly, and did not think it warranted a solution of unproved safety imposed on the whole population by public health authorities whom they did not fully trust. They did not see why they should accept potential side effects so that a minority may benefit.


So, how much fluoride is even added to our water supply here in Australia? And what are the levels considered safe by our health officials? The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) released a publication ‘Water fluoridation and human health in Australia: Questions and Answers’ in 2017. This was done in consultation with the jurisdictional health departments, with the aim said to provide helpful information to support their 2017 Public Statement 2017. The publication recommends that an amount of 0.6-1.1 mg/L of fluoride be added to Australian drinking water, as the most effective way to reduce tooth decay.
To take a closer look at the water supply in my local area of Kempsey, NSW, I searched the Kempsey Shire Council website. There I discovered that the council uses the Australian Drinking Guidelines, which are based on drinking water guidelines developed by the World Health Organisation. The website also listed the types of tests they regularly conduct on the local water supply, including a fluoride test. There are no results available for the public to check the concentration of fluoride in that local supply.


It should be noted that the Australian Drinking Guidelines were published in 2011, although they do claim to undergo a rolling revision to ensure that they represent the latest scientific evidence on good quality drinking water.
My family connected an ion exchange resin filtration system to our household water supply, specially designed to remove fluoride from our drinking water. This is an added expense to the running of our household, however, one that we consider necessary. Other types of filtration systems, such as activated aluminium or reverse-osmosis membranes have also been shown to be effective at removing most of the fluoride from your domestic water supply. Obtaining your drinking water from a rainwater tank is another good alternative to having fluoride-free water to drink.


So, the question now needs to be asked, with all the knowledge available about fluoride, why does our government still consider it safe to use in our water supply, especially for our children?

RELATED ARTICLES

3 COMMENTS

  1. Thanks for the information.
    I have been using reverse osmosis systems for fresh water for the past 5 years to remove fluoride and chlorine as well as filtering particulates.
    My health and brain feel better overall, my son who had ASD and ADHD, is now living a normal life and unmedicated.

    Why is the government still insisting on using waste products (fluoride) to poison the population?

    So many questions, so few answers!

  2. Fluoride is a by product of aluminium & along with chlorine is a toxin to human body. Aluminium is absorbed into the fatty tissues of the body & my reading has revealed could have been responsible for an increase in breast cancer- underwires & deodorant. The brain is mostly fat.
    In 1966, the WA govt tried to introduce fluoridation & there was one hell of an uproar from the public. A report had just been released fro US suggesting there had been a marked increase in child leukaemia & other cancers. They were concerned about the correlation between fluoride & cancer. The US had enjoyed good teeth health in children for a number of years since the aluminium industry had convinced them it hardened tooth enamel. It was suggested in the report that fluoride may be of benefit up until the age of 12 years but after that possibly stored in the body being a toxin. The immune system does not know what to do with these synthetic substances so will store ( in fatty ares “ just in case the body needs to use it at a later date. The WA govt said they would abandon the idea but it is possible they lied or did it later without telling anyone!
    What really gets me angry is that they subject the whole population to this to what detriment?? What about all the adults & sports people who would drink a lot of water? What about a growing number of people, like me , who have allergies to synthetic substances both internally & externally?
    Subjecting the whole population to folic acid in bread is another issue- just to lower the incidence of Spina Bifida babies. I can’t even make my own bread. Folic acid has been added to the flour.
    These concerns about health should be treated on an individual basis. I fix these issues for myself when they arise. Don’t eat bread anymore & all water is filtered! How dare a govt force force this on my health for the sake of a few!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Ivan M. Paton on Approval Of Remdesivir
Beth on Free and Fair?
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Victorian Change to Mandates
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Health care in crisis
Novus Ordo Seclorum on Health care in crisis
Burnthehousedown on Postal vote outrage
Shanthini Balasuriyar on Queensland CHO – a law unto himself
Billie Hutton on Convoy to Canberra Two
Lynn a freedom warrior on Convoy to Canberra Two
Elizabeth on Ruble on the rise
Yvonne Ford on Pfizer drug recall
Gene Trevor Wyngaard on NZ Scrap vaccine mandates
Frances Mahy on Russia Sanctions The U.S.A
Peter Coxhead on My Story, So Far
Theodora Zajaz on Novak Out Of U.S. Open.
Leonie Young on Probuild Buy-Out
Shelley Madden on Pfizer, Stranger than Fiction
Debra Mullins on AVN vs Brendan Murphy
Malcolm on The End Game
Sabina on What’s Next?
Drew Duncan on Belarus Under Threat
Robyn on What’s Next?
Sofia Rutteman on Here We Go Again, Part 2
Robert Burns on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Kim Henry on Pfizer Whistleblower
Lee Y on Give Me Five
Linda Nemeth on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Warwick Hibble on Ricardo Bosi Public Address
Lesley on The Data Is Ours
Patricia Poppeliers on Here We Go Again, Part 2
Dani Stevens on Trouble in Paradise
Colin Stevens on VICTORY FOR THE PEOPLE
Leanne Robyn on VICTORY FOR THE PEOPLE
Dianedraytonbuckland on Facebook: Judge, Jury and Executioner
Michael Chere on Before You Inject Your Child
Kerry Taylor on Which one of us is blind?
Kathy Hirsch on First Nations Locked Down
Gloria Feather on Undermining The Indigenous.
Marie Millikin on Let us talk about intuition.
Lucienne Helm on Let us talk about intuition.
Susan Wilson on The real revolution
Jennifer Leonard on 2020 a year to forget
F J on Strange Times
Tracey Parsons on IBAC DAY 9
stacie rose on Which one of us is blind?
Uncertainty on My Story, So Far
Tracey on A Veteran’s Plea
Zaidee Lens Van Rijn on My Story, So Far
Alissandra Moon on The Rise of Medical Apartheid
Peggy Gothe on Mum, I don’t feel well
Keith Cashman on Mum, I don’t feel well
Melinda c Taylor on Mum, I don’t feel well
Vaughan Oke on Which one of us is blind?
Jane Ramsay on Choice vs Ultimatum
Brian K Wilson on Which one of us is blind?
Scott Dawson on Which one of us is blind?
Sandra Dee on ST KILDA STREET PICNIC